Record hosted Windows artifact acceptance
All checks were successful
All checks were successful
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1073,7 +1073,7 @@ do not mix mechanical moves with semantic changes.
|
||||
stable, and an optional Windows-host run of the packaged EXE reported the 548-opcode/FFmpeg-ABI-3 smoke marker.
|
||||
Slice 3 is now active: add the read-only hosted Windows artifact job while retaining the accepted Linux job.
|
||||
|
||||
**Slice 3 implementation completed 2026-08-03; hosted acceptance pending:** the existing artifact workflow
|
||||
**Slice 3 completed and hosted-accepted 2026-08-03:** the existing artifact workflow
|
||||
now has independent `ubuntu-latest` Linux and Windows jobs under inherited read-only contents permission.
|
||||
Windows provisions MinGW-w64 GCC/binutils, restores only its manifest-keyed editor/FFmpeg/template inputs,
|
||||
calls the accepted `tools/build-windows-x64.sh`, and uploads the ZIP, external archive hash, build metadata,
|
||||
@@ -1081,7 +1081,9 @@ do not mix mechanical moves with semantic changes.
|
||||
authority. A core-gated source-only workflow regression pins that boundary and deliberately proves that
|
||||
`publish-release` still needs only `linux-release` during this slice. Acceptance requires the first hosted
|
||||
develop run to leave promotion skipped and complete both platform jobs; slice 4 then replaces the Linux-only
|
||||
promotion contract with dual-archive verification and publication.
|
||||
promotion contract with dual-archive verification and publication. The develop run at `9d3ab30` then
|
||||
completed both platform artifact jobs and skipped tag-only promotion, accepting the runner/toolchain/cache/
|
||||
build/upload path and the non-tag authority boundary. Slice 4 is now active.
|
||||
|
||||
**Completion gate:** one deliberately selected future tag produces a single Gitea release containing the
|
||||
Linux `.tar.gz`, Windows `.zip`, and combined archive checksums; both archives bind to the tag commit, Linux
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user