6 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
gamer147
c551d7b05e refactor(battle-node): drop dead BattleResult.{Lose,Win,Consistency} members
No dispatch arm has emitted these since the Retire/Kill rewrite to RetireWin=105
/ RetireLose=106. Remove them and the docstring paragraph that explained them.

Test fallout: delete BattleFinishBody_LoseAndConsistency_SerializeAsZeroAndTwo
(its only purpose was locking the dead wire values), and re-point
BattleFinishBody_SerializesResultAndResultCode_AsNumericWireValues at the live
LifeWin=101 so it still guards the JsonNumberEnumConverter numeric-wire behavior.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-02 21:17:30 -04:00
gamer147
a198174ede fix(battle-node): involuntary-drop survivor gets DisconnectWin, not Win=NoContest
Code-review follow-up to the dispatch unification (0a8a84b).

1. The RunAsync drop cascade synthesized BattleFinish(Win=1), which the client
   renders as RESULT_CODE.NoContest ("battle ended in no contest") instead of a
   win. Add DisconnectWin=201 (already in the client enum, routes to WIN UI) and
   ship it for involuntary opponent drops. Update PvpMidGameDisconnect_FullCascade.

2. Remove BuildBattleFinishNoContest() — dead since the Retire/Kill arm moved to
   RetireWin/RetireLose.

3. Correct the BattleResult docstring: Lose/Win/Consistency are no longer emitted
   by any dispatch arm; they survive only as serialization-test constants.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-02 19:26:16 -04:00
gamer147
0a8a84b2cc refactor(battle-node): unify TurnEndFinal / Retire-Kill / gameplay-forwarder dispatch across types
Three dispatch arms had Type-based branching that was either wrong or
unnecessary. Unified per the audit doc's recommended order, grounded in
verified facts about each participant's PushAsync.

(1) TurnEndFinal — was branched: PvP broadcast TurnEnd+Judge (wrong on a
game-end signal); Scripted pushed BattleFinish(LifeWin). Unified:
  - forward the envelope to other (matches prod TK2 capture
    battle-traffic_tk2_regular.ndjson:273 — loser receives TurnEndFinal
    from server before BattleFinish)
  - push BattleFinish(LifeWin) to from (winner)
  - push BattleFinish(LifeLose) to other (loser)
  - Phase → Terminal

  Requires ScriptedBotParticipant.PushAsync to no longer fire its 3-frame
  burst on TurnEndFinal (previously it reacted to both TurnEnd and
  TurnEndFinal). The dispatch arm now owns TurnEndFinal's response; the
  bot reacting too would race with the BattleFinish push. Bot still
  fires on regular TurnEnd as before.

(2) Retire / Kill — was branched: PvP pushed Lose=0 (NotFinish) /
Win=1 (NoContest); Scripted pushed BuildBattleFinishNoContest() (Win=1).
Both shipped wrong RESULT_CODE values; the audit doc's outstanding item
documented this. Unified:
  - push BattleFinish(RetireLose=106) to from (the retirer)
  - push BattleFinish(RetireWin=105) to other (the survivor)
  - Phase → Terminal

  Added RetireWin=105 / RetireLose=106 to BattleResult enum with the
  same player-perspective convention.

(3) PvP gameplay forwarder (TurnStart / PlayActions / Echo /
TurnEndActions / JudgeResult) — had a redundant `Type == BattleType.Pvp`
guard. Verified that BothAfterReady() is naturally only true when both
participants are RealParticipant (ScriptedBot / NoOpBot don't implement
IHasHandshakePhase per RealParticipant.cs:20-23 / Participants/*.cs grep).
Dropped the redundant guard.

Bot type still has its dedicated InitBattle/Loaded/TurnEnd arms above
the unified ones, so Bot-specific behavior is unchanged.

Tests: 177 battle-node tests passing.
- Updated 9 tests to match the unified dispatch (paired BattleFinish
  pushes, correct RESULT_CODE values, forwarded TurnEndFinal envelope).
- ScriptedBotParticipantTests.PushAsync_TurnEndFinal_* rewritten to
  assert the bot does NOT fire on TurnEndFinal (was asserting it did).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-02 18:37:24 -04:00
gamer147
1685b509c3 fix(battle-node): TurnEndFinal pushes LifeWin=101 (player perspective), not LifeLose=102
End-to-end trace of FinishBattleEffect proved my prior direction was
backwards. The path is:

  RESULT_CODE → JudgeResultReceive switch (NetworkBattleManagerBase:1439-1459)
              → SettingResultUI_SpecialResultTypeText
              → _finishEffectType = battleResult
  → eventually FinishBattleEffect(:1267-1316):
      bool isPlayer = false;
      switch (_finishEffectType) {
        case WIN:  isPlayer = true;  break;
        case LOSE: isPlayer = false; break;
      }
      InitiateGameEndSequence(!isPlayer);  // NEGATED
  → BattleManagerBase.InitiateGameEndSequence(hasWon):
      hasWon=true → WIN screen; hasWon=false → LOSE screen.

So LifeWin=101 (player perspective: "I won by life") → _finishEffectType=LOSE
→ isPlayer=false → hasWon=true → WIN UI. And LifeLose=102 ("I lost") → LOSE UI.

My prior misread treated the inner switch's BATTLE_RESULT_TYPE param as
the final UI render — but that param only feeds the secondary "by retire
/ by disconnect" text, not the primary WIN/LOSE. The real flip happens at
FinishBattleEffect:1315's !isPlayer negation.

User's live repro (bot HP to 0 → LOSS screen) confirmed the inversion.

The prior prod TK2 capture interpretation was also corrected: line 274
`result:102` was a LOSS capture (player lost to the opponent's attack on
line 271), not a win as I claimed earlier.

Changes:
- BattleResult.cs: docstring rewritten with the full FinishBattleEffect
  trace. Members reordered (LifeWin first since it's used by Scripted).
- BattleSession.cs:267: Scripted TurnEndFinal arm pushes LifeWin instead
  of LifeLose.
- Test updated to assert LifeWin=101 + describe the inversion lesson so
  the next reader sees the prior bug context.

177 battle-node tests passing.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-02 18:11:24 -04:00
gamer147
ee23985055 fix(battle-node): push BattleFinish on Scripted TurnEndFinal so the client doesn't park on the disconnect-checker
Before: when the player declared their final winning turn (TurnEndFinal),
Scripted mode forwarded it to the bot — which fired a useless 3-frame
TurnStart/TurnEnd/Judge burst as if the game were continuing. No
BattleFinish was ever pushed, so the client's
BattleFinishToOpponentDisConnectChecker (NetworkBattleManagerBase.cs:1640
+ BattleFinishToOpponentDisConnectChecker.cs) parked the player on a
"waiting for opponent" dialog for 128 seconds, eventually falling through
to a synthetic OnDisConnectWin. The user could see "opponent defeated"
animations but couldn't proceed to the post-battle screen.

After: Scripted TurnEndFinal pushes BattleFinish with result=LifeLose=102
to the player (matches the RESULT_CODE the client expects per
NetworkBattleReceiver.cs:963-986; client maps LifeLose → "opponent's life
ran out, PLAYER WIN" UI per NetworkBattleManagerBase.cs:1450-1459). Phase
transitions to Terminal so RunAsync's PvP-disconnect cascade doesn't
synthesize a second BattleFinish on top. No bot burst — the game is
over.

Wire reference: prod TK2 capture battle-traffic_tk2_regular.ndjson:273-274
shows server pushing TurnEndFinal followed immediately by BattleFinish
result:102.

BattleResult enum gets the LifeWin=101 / LifeLose=102 values and a
corrected docstring. The pre-existing Lose=0 / Win=1 / Consistency=2
values stay (Retire/Kill flow ships them today and works as "no contest"
end-of-battle), but their docstring no longer claims they're the WS
shape — they were always the HTTP /finish shape, mislabeled.

TurnEnd (regular, not final) keeps the existing forward-to-bot behavior
in Scripted mode — that's a normal turn boundary, not game end.

PvP TurnEndFinal still broadcasts the same TurnEnd+Judge as regular
TurnEnd; the actual game-end BattleFinish push in PvP rides the loser's
Retire/Kill or the disconnect cascade in RunAsync.

177 battle-node tests passing (was 176; +1 covering the new dispatch arm).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-02 17:48:20 -04:00
gamer147
677b1f1392 feat(battle-node): BattleResult enum for BattleFinish.result wire codes 2026-06-01 11:41:16 -04:00