fix(rank-battle): route ai-start through the queue-time MatchContext
Live-smoke bug 2026-06-02: queued Bloodcraft (deck #5), wire showed classId=2 (Swordcraft) for self_info on the /ai_unlimited_rank_battle/start response — client rendered the wrong leader. Two layers of the same bug: 1. MatchContextBuilder.BuildForRankBattleAsync hardcoded deckNo=1 instead of taking it from the do_matching request — verified against data_dumps/captures/traffic.ndjson L17 where deck_no=5 was on the wire. Signature changes to (viewerId, format, deckNo); DoMatchingInternal passes req.DeckNo. 2. AiStartInternal rebuilt MatchContext from scratch — but the /ai_*/start request body is BaseRequest only, no deck_no on the wire. The fix uses the MatchContext the bridge already stored at do_matching resolution time (in the Bot PendingBattle), so deck/cosmetic data is consistent end-to-end. New IBattleSessionStore.TryFindPendingForViewer(viewerId) finds the viewer's pending battle for lookup. The store entry persists across ai_start (idempotent reads are fine — the WS handler removes on connect). No-pending sentinel: ai_id=-1 surfaces the "no AI assigned" error in the client. Tests: 936 → 939 passing. - MatchContextBuilderTests.BuildForRankBattle_uses_the_caller_supplied_deck_number seeds deck #1 (class 1) and deck #5 (class 6) and asserts the deckNo argument picks the right one. - RankBattleControllerTests.AiStart_self_info_class_matches_queued_deck_number is the end-to-end regression: register Bot battle with deck #5, hit /ai_unlimited_rank_battle/start, assert self_info.classId == 6. - RankBattleControllerTests.AiStart_without_pending_battle_returns_neg1_sentinel locks the defensive ai_id=-1 path. - Existing AiStart_* tests bypass do_matching, so adapted to call a new RegisterBotBattleAsync helper that mirrors what InProcessPairUp does on AI-fallback resolution. SeedDeckAsync gains an optional classId so test cases can differentiate decks by class (was always picking Classes.First()). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ public class MatchContextBuilderTests
|
||||
using var scope = factory.Services.CreateScope();
|
||||
var builder = scope.ServiceProvider.GetRequiredService<IMatchContextBuilder>();
|
||||
|
||||
var ctx = await builder.BuildForRankBattleAsync(viewerId, Format.Rotation);
|
||||
var ctx = await builder.BuildForRankBattleAsync(viewerId, Format.Rotation, deckNo: 1);
|
||||
|
||||
Assert.That(ctx.UserName, Is.EqualTo("Ranker"));
|
||||
Assert.That(ctx.BattleType, Is.EqualTo(11), "BattleType=11 matches the prod rank-battle wire value (same as TK2).");
|
||||
@@ -148,10 +148,33 @@ public class MatchContextBuilderTests
|
||||
using var scope = factory.Services.CreateScope();
|
||||
var builder = scope.ServiceProvider.GetRequiredService<IMatchContextBuilder>();
|
||||
|
||||
Assert.That(async () => await builder.BuildForRankBattleAsync(viewerId, Format.Rotation),
|
||||
Assert.That(async () => await builder.BuildForRankBattleAsync(viewerId, Format.Rotation, deckNo: 1),
|
||||
Throws.Exception);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
[Test]
|
||||
public async Task BuildForRankBattle_uses_the_caller_supplied_deck_number()
|
||||
{
|
||||
// Regression for the 2026-06-02 "queued Bloodcraft, saw Swordcraft leader"
|
||||
// wire bug — MatchContextBuilder.BuildForRankBattleAsync hardcoded deckNo=1.
|
||||
// Seed two decks for different classes (1 and 6) and confirm the deckNo
|
||||
// argument picks the right one.
|
||||
await using var factory = new SVSimTestFactory();
|
||||
var viewerId = await factory.SeedViewerAsync(displayName: "Ranker");
|
||||
await factory.SeedGlobalsAsync();
|
||||
await factory.SeedDeckAsync(viewerId, Format.Unlimited, number: 1, name: "Deck 1", classId: 1);
|
||||
await factory.SeedDeckAsync(viewerId, Format.Unlimited, number: 5, name: "Deck 5", classId: 6);
|
||||
|
||||
using var scope = factory.Services.CreateScope();
|
||||
var builder = scope.ServiceProvider.GetRequiredService<IMatchContextBuilder>();
|
||||
|
||||
var deck1Ctx = await builder.BuildForRankBattleAsync(viewerId, Format.Unlimited, deckNo: 1);
|
||||
var deck5Ctx = await builder.BuildForRankBattleAsync(viewerId, Format.Unlimited, deckNo: 5);
|
||||
|
||||
Assert.That(deck1Ctx.ClassId, Is.EqualTo("1"), "deckNo=1 → class 1.");
|
||||
Assert.That(deck5Ctx.ClassId, Is.EqualTo("6"), "deckNo=5 → class 6 (the wire-bug case).");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
[Test]
|
||||
public async Task BuildForTwoPick_falls_back_to_default_loadout_when_unequipped()
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user